Friday, August 14, 2020

does anyone believe paying child support based on percentage of his income is cruel and unfair?  

does anyone believe paying child support based on percentage of his income is cruel and unfair?  

answers 0:Ok please dont turn my question into me saying any man should not pay child support. I do believe every man should take full responsibility of raising their child with or without being with their mother. Im just saying is that fair how they go by what a man gets payed? Why not make a man pay by estimating food, clothing, living expenses and medical insurance or whatever else it takes to make sure their child is raised right? For instance my wife looks at Daily Mail every day and she was telling me that they take $20,000 out of comedian Kevin Harts income and his Ex wife is now taking him back to court because she wants even more then that. Really! 20,000 is way beyond a child's needs a month ,that's $240, 000 a year. Mark Anthony ! pays around the same yearly also and his Ex wife is taking him back to court to. To me thats just greed. What about a woman's responsibility to work and put in their 2 cents in as well? Paying child support like that just puts a woman into early retirement before 10 years just because she had a child with a rich man and if the father falls off and aint famous anymore which I mean he's not getting paid anymore he'll be broke before he knows it in a short period of time and his Ex wife will be still living it up. Why does a woman have to live the lavish celebrity life like a celebrity just because she has a child with a rich father. Im just asking thats all...Show moreanswers 1:In the celebrity cases you mentioned, how is it cruel? The mothers may or may not be greedy*, but still, how is it cruel? When a man has such a high income that he can afford a quarter of a million dollars in child support, while still living a life of luxury himself, how does it qualify as cruelty?! There are child support arrangements that are cruel to the no! ncustodial parent, but generally speaking, those don't happen at the uber-wealthy level. *If the celebrity has children from a different mother who still live with him, I'm not convinced that the mother is greedy when she wants her own child to have the same material advantages as his half-siblings. One could argue that the dad owes an equal standard of living to all his children, even if the mother also benefits from the advantage....answers 2:I Dont believe in child support. I think custody should be split week on week off and the only thing that gets split is medical dental and vision oh and extra curricular activities. Each parent should be responsible for the children financially on their week. It's how my ex and I do it and we have never gone to court. I never want some judge that doesn't know us dictating how my ex and I raise our daughter. Funny but we are better parents apart then we were together and we seem to respect each other more. And our daughter doesn't ha! ve the issues that most children of divorced parents have. In a prefect world this arrangement would work for everyone if only women could let go of the control....answers 3:May I add since certain answers I've read . Since the rich father is more financially stable why dont he get the child. And what if the shoe was on the other foor and it was a woman paying the man. I bet to all wemen it would be cruel and unfair . Right!answers 4:Because the celebrity father wants his children to have the best....answers 5:240.000 per year is peanuts when you make millions per yearthey are not even taking out 20% for one child from these people like they do for the working stiffno, hard to feel they are paying too much...answers 6:If its the man he should pay the maximum amount. If he needs to he can get 3 or 4 jobs. Damn dead beat!answers 7:Yes it is.

No comments:

Post a Comment